|
GUIDELINES
FOR DOCUMENTATION OF
ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY
DISORDER
Note:
The
Kansas
Association of Higher Education and
Disability has developed standards for
documentation of
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
(AD/HD) that can be used by post-secondary
institutions to determine appropriate
accommodations.
It’s important to note that AD/HD
is commonly referred to as Attention Deficit
Disorder (ADD) and for the purpose of these
guidelines, these terms are interchangeable.
Each post-secondary institution in
Kansas may adapt these guidelines to fit the
unique needs of their own institution.
Introduction
Students
requesting accommodations or services
because of AD/HD are required to submit
documentation to determine eligibility in
accordance with Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA).
A diagnosis of AD/HD does not
necessarily qualify a student for academic
accommodations under the law.
To establish that a student is
covered under Section 504 and the ADA, the
documentation must indicate that the
disability substantially limits some
major life activity, including learning.
For students previously diagnosed who
have not continuously received medical and
educational support, a comprehensive
evaluation may be necessary to determine
whether academic accommodations are
appropriate.
The following
guidelines are provided in the interest of
assuring that documentation of AD/HD is
complete and supports the request for
accommodations.
DSS will determine eligibility and
appropriate accommodations
based on the quality, recency and
completeness of the documentation submitted.
The following requirements provide
students, schools, and professional
diagnosticians with a common understanding
of the components of documentation that are
necessary to validate the existence of
AD/HD, the impact on the individuals
educational performance, and the need for
academic accommodations for the purpose of
the ADA and Section 504.
A
Qualified Professional Must Conduct the
Evaluation
The
assessment must be administered by a trained
and qualified (i.e., certified and/or
licensed) professional, who has had direct
experience with adolescents and adults with
AD/HD. A qualified professional may include
but is not limited to a medical doctor,
psychologist, or student clinician who is
being supervised by a professional. The
evaluator’s name, title and professional
credentials and affiliation should be
provided.
The professional completing the
evaluation should not be a family member.
All reports should be on
letterhead, typed, dated, signed, and
otherwise legible.
Documentation
Must Be Current
Reasonable
accommodations are based on the current
impact of the disability on academic
performance. In most cases, this means that
a diagnostic evaluation
should be age appropriate and relevant to
the students learning environment, and show
the students current level of functioning.
If documentation does not address the
individuals current level of functioning, a
re-evaluation may be required.
Documentation
Must Include a Specific Diagnosis
The report must
include a specific diagnosis of AD/HD based
on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. It is
recommended that the clinician report the
diagnostic criteria used to support the
diagnosis.
The diagnostician should use direct
language in the diagnosis of AD/HD, avoiding
the use of terms such as “suggests,”
“is indicative of,” or “attentional
problems.”
Co-existing
Conditions
The diagnostic
assessment should examine the possibility of
co-existing conditions including medical and
psychiatric disorders as well as a possible
learning disability. The evaluator should consider
and discuss the possibility of alternative
disorders that may mimic AD/HD.
Documentation
Must Include Evidence of Current Impairment
Statement
of Presenting Problem
A
history of the individual’s presenting
attentional symptoms should be provided,
including evidence of ongoing
hyperactive-impulsive or inattentive
behaviors that significantly impair
functioning in an academic setting.
Diagnostic
Interview
Information from a structured
interview should be thorough and may
include:
·
Family history
·
Educational history
·
Developmental history
·
Medical history
·
Social history
·
Review of prior
psycho-educational reports
·
Description of current
functional limitations pertaining to an
educational setting
·
Relevant history of
therapeutic treatment
Documentation
Must Include Relevant Testing Information
Psycho-educational
assessments are important in determining the
current impact of the disorder on the
individual’s ability to function in an
academic setting. The report must include
objective data, which might include, but not
be limited to psychological assessments,
educational assessments, rating scales,
memory function tests, attention or tracking
tests, or continuous performance tests. A
score report page(s), which presents the
tests, sub tests,
standard scores, and percentiles, should
accompany the report.
Current
Plan for Treatment and Effects of Medication
Please
summarize current plans for treatment
including the use of medications.
Please indicate whether or not the
individual was evaluated while on
medication, and whether the use of
medications mitigate the impact of the
disorder on the individual’s ability to
function in an academic setting.
Recommendations
for Accommodations
A
diagnostic report may include specific
recommendations for accommodation(s).
A prior history of an accommodation,
without a demonstration of a current need,
does not in and of itself warrant the
provision of similar
accommodation.
Each accommodation recommended by an
evaluator should include a rationale.
The evaluation should support the
recommendations with specific test results
or clinical observations.
If an accommodation is not clearly
identified in the diagnostic report, (your
institution) will seek clarification and, if
necessary, more information, and will make
the final determination as to whether
appropriate and reasonable accommodations
are warranted and can be provided.
(Your institution) reserves the right
to request reassessment when questions
regarding previous assessment or previous
service provision arise.
|